Maybe you had to have that UID and anchor engraving with an extra fancy anti-corrosion finish because you live near the coast.
Maybe you didn’t want a beavertail but still craved those front cocking serrations. It seems like it’s got the best of the options unless you want the E2, piranha G10, or some hardwood grips. It has a beavertail and front cocking serrations, both of which I’m grateful to have. The front sight is TRUGLO TFO instead of a SIGLITE. It has a false ‘magwell’ made of extended handguards. Since my TACOPS is a 9mm, it came with four 20-round magazines. When I stray from the brand, it’s usually for good cause. I just so happen to find SIG works well for me. I’ve owned a GLOCK G19 Gen3, several Walther PPK/s models, an FN FNP-9, and probably a few others I can’t recall. My first ever purchase was a Springfield XD-45. I had professional instruction on an M9 after shooting the 92FS as a teenager as well. 22 pistol I learned to shoot on as a kid, and I had fired dozens of others. My opinions here have been formed after about 2000 rounds of various ammo through the TACOPS, and uncountable sums through other models.īefore finding SIG SAUER, I had owned several 1911s, a Beretta 92FS, some. Since you’re here anyway, let’s talk about the merits and drawbacks of a TACOPS model to any of the other P226 choices available, and some SIG siblings. I’m not going to compare the SIG SAUER P226 TACOPS to a GLOCK G17 because the two don’t compare. I’m not here to gloat, brag, or convince you of anything. This won’t be one of those stuffy historical or scientific reviews.
0 kommentar(er)
